Showing posts with label Tommy Lee Jones. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tommy Lee Jones. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Review The Sunset Limited

                  Ever wake up, eye the room and consider never getting up?  It's worth considering.  Maybe staying in bed isn't such a bad idea.  It was that defender of the concept of man's original sin, Blaise Pascal, who wrote that all of man's problems stemmed from the inability to sit quietly in a room alone.  Philosophy, after all, then and ever since has been about preparing to die.  
                The Sunset Limited Cormac McCarthy lives out Pascal's one-room maxim--the two characters ("White" and "Black") don't leave a small apartment (for a while)--using their time to consider existence, grace, suicide, nothingness, and a universe with/without divine supervision.  Black, played by Samuel L. Jackson, is the kind of Christian one can tolerate:  committed but considerate, faithful but devoted to questioning his own apologetics.  He begs his God for the power to voice Truth to White, played by Tommy Lee Jones.  White is a professor of philosophy who has run out of track; earlier in the evening he threw himself in the path of the Sunset Limited model train in New York's subways.  Miraculously, he was saved by Black in what could be grace, or misfortune for the luckless White. 
                  This isn't a standard play.  It has the brooding beauty of O'Neill and McCarthy's obsessive focus on life and death.  What other topic is there for old Cormac anyway?  The only movement in the drama involves slight action around a single apartment in a slum; the only conflict is in the dialogue and the possibility that White will leave the room and meet a preemptive fate.  Albert Camus, the French-Algerian author, probably wrote the most famous work on the question of suicide.  Camus opened his Myth of Sisyphus with these lines:  "There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.   Judging whether life is or not worth living amongs to answering the fundamental question of philosophy.  All the rest--whether or not the world has three dimensions, whether the mind has nine or twelve categories--comes afterwards.  These are games; one must first answer."  Why bother?  Why wake up?  Is there radical contingency or some wicked game of grace and holy meaning?  Is "God" just and loving, a "gentle Jesus meek and mild"?  Or is he some gnostic overlord, ruthlessly indifferent or (even grimmer) actively on the side of radical evil!  With the state of the world, Black and White have a lot to talk about.  Both take the debate seriously and personally.  "It is personal," White admits of his obsessions and preoccupations.  "That's what an education does.  It makes the world personal."   
                   Black is kind and generous and honest.  And he's chosen to live his life sincere and committed to a higher power whom he is convinced "saved him" in the jailhouse.  (Though, as White points out, the bloody episode we are provided illustrates the wicked logic of God's grace.)  White repeatedly asks Black why he lives in the apartment.  It's unsafe, deep in the ghetto.  Black admits that he likes the simplicity and feels his work is unfinished.  Why leave?  Martin Luther King's picture stares calmly behind the characters, wrapped in a baggie and hanging from the wall.  But, admittedly, the best lines belong to White.  And Tommy Lee Jones is amazing as the spiky, easily offended and desperate White.  As the dawn opens behind their conversation, White is exasperated:

                I don't believe in God. Can you understand that? Look around you man. Cant you see? The clamor and  din of those in torment has to be the sound most pleasing to his ear. And I loathe these discussions. The argument of the village atheist whose single passion is to revile endlessly that which he denies the existence of in the first place. Your fellowship is a fellowship of pain and nothing more. And if that pain were actually collective instead of simply reiterative then the sheer weight of it would drag the world from the walls of the universe and send it crashing and burning through whatever night it might yet be capable of engendering until it was not even ash. And justice? Brotherhood? Eternal life? Good god, man. Show me a religion that prepares one for death. For nothingness. There's a church I might enter. Yours prepares one only for more life. For dreams and illusions and lies. If you could banish the fear of death from men's hearts they wouldnt live a day. Who would want this nightmare if not for fear of the next? The shadow of the axe hangs over every joy.
               What is so powerful about McCarthy's two-man show is that by the end you are can identify with a distraught believer and a hopeless man lost in the bleak labyrinth of nihilism.  For White, "the good" was culture.  Meaning and truths, however constructed and buried under a flurry of quotation marks, could be sought if never fully obtained.  But the "fragile" and "frail" culture that propelled him onward, according to White, is precipitously vanishing.  Slawomir Sierakowski, a Polish intellectual and neo-Marxist, recently admitted in an interview:  “In today’s world we know more and more but we don’t use our knowledge to get together and change the world."  He continued, "We use it so that each of us, individually, can adapt to this imperfect world.  That we can get together and change this imperfect world almost no one believes.”  
                Perhaps, if we cannot radically change the world, maybe we can improve it so that we can live decently within it without need of a collision with the Sunset Limited.  Then, at least sleep could come a little quicker and waking up would be a little easier.   
  
                     

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln"

                    For those looking to experience a movie that has all the visual quality of the best Civil War films and the charming character-driven plot of the best historical drama, check it out.  Daniel Day-Lewis's story-telling as the chatty Lincoln has a Brando-like quality:  you cant take your eyes off him (and neither can Lincoln's male helpers with whom he has several intimate moments.)
                  Of course the best kept secret of the film (and of the American history of Reconstruction) is Thaddeus Stevens--the powerful Pennsylvania Radical Republican--who has the precise amount of acid and scorn for the House's yokels, cynics, and hucksters.  If few contemporary educated and conscientious voters have an outlet to spout rage at the moronic inferno blazing in Michele Bachmann's district or at a Rand Paul stump speech, Stevens seems to act as a delightful proxy for us--albeit in the 19th century.  He lays waste to 'em!  Tommy Lee Jones, as ever, is masterfully patient in a stern and focused portrayal that could have been ruined by bluster.
                  My only issue is a historical one:  Where was Anderew Johnson, Lincoln's Vice President who, after inheriting the presidency, became our worst President?  Wasn't he, impeached and disgraced, worth seeing since he is the darkest decision in Lincoln's legacy?  And while I thought the dreamy sequences that illustrate Lincon's nightmares were haunting and unexpected, seeing Lincoln's face in a flame with a flashback to his second inaugural (after his assassination scene) was a bit much.  But Spielberg never can give up on the happy endings, can he?
                  The critic for The New Republic made a crucial argument for those who enjoyed this movie:
"That is the real lesson for now, in these few days. Being a nobleman or a saint is not enough in a leader. We need someone who can stoop to getting the job done, and wheedling the necessary votes in any way it takes. Lincoln the movie may look archaic and nostalgic in time—even in quite a short time. But for a few days or weeks now, it is the moment in a way few modern movies have managed. It’s very good, but that’s not the point. It’s necessary. Make sure your children take you to see it."
                  Of course, the 13th amendment passed and the movie does a strong job of illustrating the art of the bribe and the suspense of high-pressure negotiations.  But it also neglects the century blacks had to wait in order to gain political equality.  And it neglects to confront (rather than merely reflect) the dysfunctional and outmoded institutions that can allow such grievous injustices to be perpetuated.  While I would recommend this film to anyone, what our culture needs after Lincoln, a soothing movie about political healing, is a film about Reconstruction:  The moment when the best hopes of federal action were dashed by conservative "small government" types; when bought senators and paid representatives knowingly subsidized private industry; when black rights were buried under the flummery of "states rights"; when Lincoln's notion of a government by, for, and of the people disappeared for a generation into a Gilded Age.